THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte RICHARD L. TAGG
________________
Appeal No. 1998-3315
Application 08/739,065
________________
HEARD: FEBRUARY 7, 2000
________________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB and NASE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
This case comes before us again on request for rehearing
of our decision mailed February 17, 2000, in which we reversed
the examiner’s rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
first paragraph, and affirmed the examiner’s rejection of
claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007