Ex parte FELMUS et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-3359                                                        
          Application 08/572,347                                                      


               Independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                          
               1.  An improved method of controlling a mailing machine                
          wherein said mailing machine includes a microcontroller system              
          for executing machine control algorithms during each control                

          cycle and having a user interface system responsive to user                 
          interface algorithms, wherein said improved method comprises                
          the steps of:                                                               
               dividing said control cycle into first discrete time                   
          intervals sufficient to allow completion of said respective                 
          control algorithms and second discrete time intervals, and                  
               providing for partial execution of user interface                      
          algorithm during said second discrete time intervals and                    
          completion of said user interface algorithms during subsequent              
          control cycles.                                                             
               The Examiner relies on the following references:                       
          DiGiulio et al. (DiGiulio)    4,959,600           Sept. 25, 1990            
          Salazar                       5,367,236           Nov.  22, 1994            
               Claims 1 through 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                
          as being unpatentable over DiGiulio in view of Salazar.                     
               Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the              
          Examiner, reference is made to the brief and answer for the                 
          respective details thereof.                                                 
                                       OPINION                                        
               We will not sustain the rejection of claims 1 through 5                
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                                      

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007