THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JACOB STOLTZE
and JORGEN KAMSTRUP-LARSEN
_____________
Appeal No. 1998-3366
Application No. 08/591,506
______________
HEARD: MAY 3, 2000
_______________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, STAAB
and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1-4 and 7-14. Claims 5 and 6, the
only other claims pending in the application, have been
indicated as being allowable if rewritten in independent form.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007