Ex parte RONNBERG et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 1998-3367                                                        
          Application No. 08/545,717                                                  


               Claim 1, the sole independent claim on appeal requires,                
          in part, that the waist belt “has a stiffness of between 25 g               
          and                                                                         
          90 g as measured by the modified version of test ASTM D                     
          4032-82 CIRCULAR BEND PROCEDURE.”                                           
               The examiner’s rationale in rejecting the appealed claims              
          as being based on a disclosure that does not satisfy the                    
          enablement requirement found in the first paragraph of 35                   
          U.S.C. § 112 is found on page 4 of the answer and reads as                  
          follows:                                                                    
                    The disclosure states that the waist                              
                    belt has a specific bending stiffness                             
                    calculated on [a] modified version of                             
                    the test ASTM D 4032-82 CIRCULAR BEND                             
                    PROCEDURE and that the belt is made of                            
                    non-woven material.  However, the                                 
                    Specification does not disclose of what                           
                    the belt is made, i.e.[,] the make-up of                          
                    the belt being polypropylene, polyester,                          
                    or some other type of polymer.  It does                           
                    not even disclose one procedure or                                
                    component that the belt is made of.                               
                    Appellant’s [sic, Appellants’] claims                             
                    relies [sic] on a considerably modified                           
                    version of an ASTM test.  It would take                           
                    undue experimentation to find a material                          
                    which falls within the requirements of                            
                    Appellant’s [sic, Appellants’] claims.                            
                    [Emphasis in original.]                                           
               It thus appears that the examiner’s rejection is founded               
                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007