Ex parte PHILLIPS - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1999-0242                                                        
          Application 08/643,829                                                      


          surface to the exterior of a prosthetic pylon which has a                   
          generally curvilinear exterior” (specification, page 1).                    
          Claim 28 is representative and reads as follows:                            
               28.  A prosthesis for attachment to the lower end of                   
               a                                                                      
          round plyon, said prosthesis comprising:                                    
               a coupling member having on one side a curved concave                  
          mating surface conforming substantially to a curved convex                  
          outer mating surface of said pylon and on an opposite side a                
          substantially flat mating surface;                                          
               a foot member having an upper attachment section having                
          on one side a substantially flat mating surface substantially               
          conforming to said flat mating surface of said coupling                     
          member; and                                                                 
               said mating surfaces being oriented substantially                      
          parallel to the longitudinal axis of said pylon when said                   
          corresponding conforming mating surfaces are mated together                 
          such that an axial load placed on said pylon produces a                     
          corresponding shear force on said mating surfaces in a                      
          direction substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of                
          said pylon.                                                                 
               Claims 28 and 30 through 32 stand rejected under 35                    
          U.S.C.  § 102(b) as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent No.                 
          2,897,512 to Sackett, and claim 29 stands rejected under 35                 
          U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Sackett.                         
               Reference is made to the appellant’s main and reply                    
          briefs (Paper Nos. 22 and 28) and to the examiner’s final                   
          rejection and answer (Paper Nos. 7 and 24) for the respective               
          positions of the                                                            


                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007