Ex parte FORD - Page 10




          Appeal No. 1999-0510                                                        
          Application No. 08/728,787                                                  


          Conclusion                                                                  
               The examiner’s decision to reject claims 1, 2, 4 and 6 to              
          20 is reversed, the reversal being pro forma as to claims 1,                
          2, 4 and 6 to 16.  Claims 1, 2, 4 and 6 to 20 are rejected                  
          pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b).                                              
               This decision contains new grounds of rejection pursuant               
          to 37 CFR § 1.196(b) (amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final              
          rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203              
          Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).                 
          37 CFR                                                                      
          § 1.196(b) provides, "[a] new ground of rejection shall not be              
          considered final for purposes of judicial review."                          
               37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant,                    
          WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise              
          one of the following two options with respect to the new                    
          grounds of rejection to avoid termination of proceedings (37                
          CFR § 1.197(c)) as to the rejected claims:                                  
               (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the                             
               claims so rejected or a showing of facts relating to                   
               the claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter                   
               reconsidered by the examiner, in which event the                       
               application will be remanded to the examiner . . . .                   


                                         10                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007