THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CLIFTON W. WOOD JR. and JOHN R. TUTTLE
____________
Appeal No. 1999-0526
Application No. 08/581,9371
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-11,
which are all of the claims pending in this application.
We REVERSE.
1Application for patent filed January 2, 1996. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation and/or continuation-in-part of many previous applications, the specifics of which are not
deemed necessary for a determination of any issues in this case. Accordingly, these prior applications are
not listed herein.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007