Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex parte DATON-LOVETT - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2000 > Ex parte DATON-LOVETT - Page 1

          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  
                                                            Paper No. 56              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                     __________                                       
                           Ex parte ANDREW J. DATON-LOVETT                            
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1999-0738                                  
                             Application No. 08/474,195                               
                                     __________                                       
                                HEARD: Nov. 28, 2000                                  
                                     __________                                       

          Before COHEN, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                
          STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Andrew J. Daton-Lovett appeals from the examiner’s final               
          rejection of claims 1-4, 15 and 19.  Claims 5-14, 16-18, 20                 
          and 21 stand withdrawn from consideration under 37 CFR §                    
          1.142(b) as not being readable on the elected species.  No                  
          other claims are currently pending.                                         
               We reverse.                                                            
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007