Ex parte YAMAMOTO et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1999-1056                                                        
          Application No. 08/525,844                                                  


          fails to establish a prima facie case, the rejection is                     
          improper and will be overturned.  In re Fine, 837 F.2d 1071,                
          1074, 5 USPQ2d 1596, 1598 (Fed. Cir. 1988).  In order to                    
          establish the prima facie obviousness of a claimed invention,               
          all the claim limitations                                                   
          must be taught or suggested by the prior art.  In re Royka,                 
          490 F.2d 981, 985, 180 USPQ 580, 583 (CCPA 1974).                           




               We begin our review with independent claims 1 and 6.  We               
          note that claim 6 calls for a vehicle steering control system               
          comprising a manual steering torque input means for manually                
          applying a manual steering torque and powered steering                      
          actuator means for applying an actuating steering torque to                 
          steerable wheels of a vehicle, means for detecting a lateral                
          dynamic condition of the vehicle and control means for                      
          controlling the actuating steering torque according to the                  
          detected lateral dynamic condition so that actuating steering               
          torque is dependent on the detected lateral dynamic condition               
          and a change rate of the detected lateral dynamic condition in              


                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007