Ex parte OGURA et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1999-1064                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/654,766                                                  


               The appellants’ invention is directed to an ink follower               
          for a ballpoint pen.  The claims on appeal have been reproduced             
          in an appendix to the Appellants’ Brief.                                    


                                THE APPLIED REFERENCES                                
          Urquhart                      3,334,616                Aug.  8,             
          1967                                                                        
          Case et al. (Case)            4,671,691                Jun.  9,             
          1987                                                                        
          Shiraishi                          5,348,989                Sep.            
          20, 1994                                                                    
                                                  (filed Mar. 24, 1993)               
          British Patent Application    798,897                  Jul. 30,             
          1958                                                                        
          Canadian Patent               646,258                  Aug.  7,             
          1962                                                                        
          Japanese Publication          49-30035                 Mar. 19,             
          1974                                                                        

                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claims 8-23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being              
          unpatentable over the British reference in view of the Canadian             
          reference, Urquhart, the Japanese reference, Case and                       
          Shiraishi.                                                                  
               Rather than attempt to reiterate the examiner’s full                   
          commentary with regard to the rejections and the conflicting                
          viewpoints advanced by the examiner and the appellants                      







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007