Ex parte SEEDS - Page 1




               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                           
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                 
                                                            Paper No. 17              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                               Ex parte HAROLD W. SEEDS                               
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1999-1489                                 
                              Application No. 08/691,193                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     

          Before CALVERT, MCQUADE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.            
          CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       




               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to              
          13, all the claims in the application.                                      
               The claims on appeal are drawn to a method of dynamically              
          balancing a driveshaft assembly (claims 1 to 10) and a                      
          dynamically balanced driveshaft assembly (claims 11 to 13), and             
          are reproduced in the appendix of appellant’s brief.                        








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007