Ex parte HUNDLEY et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1999-1494                                                        
          Application 08/596,062                                                      


          further consideration.                                                      


               The subject matter on appeal relates to “a two-piece                   
          cable tie of the type having a metal locking wedge inserted                 
          into a strap accepting channel formed through a strap locking               
          head which acts as a strap locking mechanism” (specification,               
          page 1).  Claim 1 is illustrative and reads as follows:                     
               1.  A cable tie including a strap having a first end and               
          a free end, a locking head secured to the first end of the                  
          strap, a plurality of walls on the locking head forming a                   
          strap accepting channel, and a metal locking wedge having a                 
          strap engaging portion positioned within the strap accepting                
          channel and an embedded portion mounted within an inner wall                
          of the locking head and a flexure region disposed                           
          therebetween, comprising:                                                   
               a groove formed on the embedded portion of the metal                   
          locking wedge.                                                              
               The references relied upon by the examiner in support of               
          the appealed rejections are:                                                
          Reynolds                      3,408,699           Nov.  5, 1968             
          Bernard et al. (Bernard)           5,517,727           May  21,             
          1996                                                                        
          Woods, European Patent Document 0 662 429         Jul. 12, 1995             
               Claims 1 through 9 stand rejected under the judicially                 
          created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as being              


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007