Ex parte GEIB et al. - Page 2




                  Appeal No. 1999-1536                                                                                         Page 2                     
                  Application No. 08/938,592                                                                                                              


                                                                  BACKGROUND                                                                              
                           The appellants' invention relates to a coin sorter comprising a rotatable disc having a                                        
                  resilient upper surface, a stationary sorting head having a lower surface generally parallel to                                         
                  and spaced slightly from the upper surface of the disc and forming a plurality of coin                                                  
                  denomination channels intersecting the periphery of the sorting head for sorting and discharging                                        
                  coins of different denominations radially outwardly from the upper surface of the disc so that                                          
                  the coins exit the disc horizontally, a coin sensor for sensing coins while they are on the disc,                                       
                  and a shunting mechanism.  The shunting mechanism of the invention is disposed in a coin                                                
                  route extending from one of the exit channels to an associated coin-collecting container for                                            
                  separating coins discharged from said one of the exit channels into two or more batches.  Claim                                         
                  49, the only claim on appeal, is reproduced in the appendix to appellants' brief.                                                       
                           The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed                                       
                  claims are:                                                                                                                             
                  Black                                        3,795,252                           Mar. 5, 1974                                           
                  Ristvedt et al. (Ristvedt)                   4,681,128                           Jul. 21, 1987                                          

                           The following rejection is before us for review .        1                                                                     





                           1According to the examiner's answer (Paper No. 28, page 2), the rejection of claim 49 under the judicially                     
                  created doctrine of double patenting set forth on page 4 of the examiner's Office action (Paper No. 18, mailed                          
                  February 24, 1998) has been overcome by the filing of a terminal disclaimer on August 5, 1998 (Paper No. 26).                           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007