Appeal No. 1999-1765 Page 9
Application No. 08/839,193
will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claim 1 and
dependent claims 10 and 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph.
We turn to the examiner’s rejection of claim 1 under 35
U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Nylund, or in the
alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007