THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HENRY A. REDMON
____________
Appeal No. 1999-1814
Application No. 08/688,108
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before ABRAMS, MCQUADE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 13-19, which are all of
the claims pending in this application. Claim 13 has been amended subsequent to the final rejection
(see Paper Nos. 9 and 10).2
1An oral hearing was set for May 17, 2000. However, pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.194(c), appellant's counsel
was notified on May 15, 2000 that an oral hearing was not necessary. This appeal has been decided on brief.
2We note that the copy of the application filed on July 29, 1996 under 37 CFR § 1.60 contains markings
which presumably reflect amendments made during the prosecution of parent Application No. 08/420,812, filed April
(continued...)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007