Ex parte IKEDA - Page 1




             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        
                                                                 Paper No. 21         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                                Ex parte TOMOHIRO IKEDA                               
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1999-2047                                 
                              Application No. 08/837,350                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                HEARD: OCTOBER 25, 2000                               
                                        _______                                       
          Before COHEN, McQUADE, and LAZARUS, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1                 
          through 3.  Claims 4 through 13, the only other claims in the               
          application, stand withdrawn from consideration pursuant to                 
          37 CFR § 1.142(b).                                                          


               Appellant’s invention pertains to a shield-plated                      
          corrugated tube.  A basic understanding of the invention can                
          be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, a copy of                   







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007