Appeal No. 1999-2063
Application No. 08/744,432
transverse perforated fold line between said first and second
panels to said bottom edge of said second panel at said bottom
edge of said label ply, said side panels including an adhesive
on the respective second sides thereof securing said label to
said article.
The references relied upon by the examiner in support of
rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are:
Rogers 202,874 Apr. 23, 1878
Ehret et al. (Ehret) 4,927,179 May. 22, 1990
Webendorfer et al. (Webendorfer) 5,031,939 Jul. 16,
1991
O'Brien 5,071,167 Dec. 10, 1991
Claims 21-26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over O’Brien in view of Rogers.
Claims 21-26 stand further rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Ehret and Webendorfer in view of
O’Brien and Rogers.
The examiner considers that O’Brien, Ehret and
Webendorfer each disclose a tuck label/form generally as
claimed, including a first panel (card 14 of O’Brien, flap
14, 16, 30 of Ehret, price tag sheet 50 of Webendorfer), and a
second panel (shipping labels 12, 12, and 42 of O’Brien,
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007