The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 54
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte NASAHIRO SUZUKI,
HISATOSHI AKITA,
and NOZOMU TAKATA
____________
Appeal No. 1999-2087
Application No. 08/595,449
____________
HEARD: NOVEMBER 13, 2000
____________
Before CALVERT, COHEN, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 1, 3 through 5, 16 through 19, 21 and 23 through 28.
Claims 7 through 15, 20 and 22 have been allowed. Claims 2
and 6 have been canceled. At pages 2 and 8 of the answer
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007