THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JOSEPH J. HARDING
and RICHARD O. RATZEL
__________
Appeal No. 1999-2095
Application 08/475,624
___________
HEARD: April 19, 2000
___________
Before CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge, MCCANDLISH,
Senior Administrative Patent Judge and PATE, Administrative
Patent Judge.
MCCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 7 through 18 and 25 through 29. The only
other claims still pending in the application have been
withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-
elected invention.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007