Interference No. 103,805
Pierfitte v. Hines v. Maor v. Lange
Senior party Lange’s motion for judgment is dismissed as moot.
Entry of adverse judgment against all three junior
parties is now appropriate. It is
Judgment
ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Count
1A is awarded against junior party MICHEL PIERFITTE and PIERRE
DELORME;
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of
Count 1A is awarded against junior party HORACE HINES, PAUL
HUG, and MARK L. LAMP;
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of
Count 1A is awarded against junior party DOV MAOR;
FURTHER ORDERED that Michel Pierfitte and Pierre Delorme
are not entitled to their application claims 15 and 16 which
correspond to Count 1A;
FURTHER ORDERED that Horace Hines, Paul Hug, and Mark L.
Lamp are not entitled to their application claims 10, 11, 21-
24, 26 and 28-31, which correspond to Count 1A;
FURTHER ORDERED that Dov Maor is not entitled to his or
her application claims 22, 25, 26, 28-31, 33, 34, 36-39, 41,
42, and 57, which correspond to Count 1A; and
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007