WALLACH et al. V. SMITH - Page 5


               Interference No. 103,854                                                                                              


                     As indicated above, claim 3 of the Wallach patent is directed to a trimer which                                 
              comprises three (3) monomers consisting of a soluble form of any tumor necrosis factor                                 
              (TNF) receptor (a.k.a., a TBP (tumor necrosis factor binding protein) trimer).                                         
                     Wallach in effect acknowledges that the claimed trimer would have been prima facie                              
              obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art in view of the multimers described in Smith claim 39                       
              and Wallach claim 1, corresponding to the count.  Brief, p. 15, last para.6  Thus, in order to                         
              meet their burden of establishing that the TBP trimer described in claim 3 is patentably                               
              distinct from other members of the genus of multimers encompassed by the claims                                        
              corresponding to the count, Wallach urges that an unexpected result is obtained by using the                           
              trimer, as opposed to other species of the referenced genus.  To that end, Wallach argues                              
              that at the time the invention was made, one of ordinary skill in the art would have had no                            
              reason to expect that TBP trimers would have “superior properties” to TBP dimers.  Brief,                              
              sentence bridging pp. 16-17.  According to Wallach, their patent and a publication by Peppel7                          
              “provide evidence which creates the expectation that the TBP trimer is a superior TNF                                  
              antagonist to a TBP dimer.”  Id., p. 17.  For support, Wallach points to the disclosure in their                       
              patent that the TNF receptors (TNF-Rs) exist in aggregated form in cells exposed to TNF.  Id.                          
              Wallach contends that from this discovery the inventors realized that “multimers of the                                
              soluble form of TNF-Rs would be more effective than monomers in inhibiting TNF activity at                             
              lower doses, since they can effectively compete with the TNF trimers for the binding sites on                          


                       6 Also, at oral hearing on July 25, 2000, counsel for Wallach acknowledged that                               
               because the TBP trimer of claim 3 is a species which falls within the genus of multimers                              
               set forth in Smith claim 39 and Wallach claim 1, the species would have been prima                                    
               facie obvious in view of the referenced genus.                                                                        
                       7 Peppel et al. (Peppel) “A Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Receptor-IgG Heavy                                    
               Chain Chimeric Protein as a Bivalent Antagonist of TNF Activity,” J. Exp. Med., Vol.                                  
               174, pp. 1483-89 (1991).                                                                                              
                                                                   5                                                                 


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007