WENNERSTROM et al. V. HUANG - Page 2



            Interference No. 104,435                                                                     
            Wennerstrom v. Huang                                                                         
                                               Judgment                                                  
                  On April 7, 2000, junior party Wennerstrom filed a paper                               
            entitled “Notice of Abandonment of Contest as to Count” (Paper                               
            No. 17).  According to 37 CFR § 1.662(a), the abandonment of                                 
            contest is regarded as a request for entry of adverse judgment.                              
            The request is granted.                                                                      
                  It is                                                                                  
                  ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of the count                            
            is entered against the junior party JOEL W. WENNERSTROM, ER-JUI                              
            CHEN, and LING CHUAN CHANG;                                                                  
                  FURTHER ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of                              
            the count is awarded in favor of the senior party LI-CHU C.                                  
            HUANG;                                                                                       
                  FURTHER ORDERED that junior party JOEL W. WENNERSTROM, ER-JUI                          
            CHEN, and LING CHUAN CHANG is not entitled to a patent containing their application          
            claims 17 and 18 which correspond to the count;                                              
                  FURTHER ORDERED that on this record, senior party LI-CHU C. HUANG is entitled          
            to his patent claim 7; and                                                                   





                                                   2                                                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007