Ex parte SHIM et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
          publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        

                                                              Paper No. 17              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                         
                                     _____________                                      
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                            
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                     _____________                                      
                                 Ex parte HYO S. SHIM                                   
                                         and                                            
                                    STEVE A. WILES                                      
                                     _____________                                      
                                 Appeal No. 2000-0085                                   
                              Application No. 08/802,582                                
                                    ______________                                      
                                       ON BRIEF                                         
                                    _______________                                     

          Before FRANKFORT, NASE and LAZARUS, Administrative Patent                     
          Judges.                                                                       
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                    


          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                        
          rejection of claims 1 through 12, which are all of the claims                 
          pending in this application.                                                  


          Appellants’ invention is directed to a frangible                              






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007