The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAKOB NIELSEN,
BRUCE TOGNAZZINI, and ROBERT GLASS
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0141
Application No. 08/673,693
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
The examiner rejected the appellants’ claims 1-28. They
appeal therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We reverse.
BACKGROUND
The invention at issue here relates to communications
bandwidth. The Internet offers access to the World Wide Web’s
1An oral hearing scheduled for Dec. 11, 2001 was waived.
(Paper No. 29.)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007