Ex parte JOHNSTON et al. - Page 1




             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        
                                                                 Paper No. 16         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                           Ex parte ROBERT G. JOHNSTON, JR                            
                                   and SCOTT JENSON                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2000-0146                                 
                              Application No. 08/979,069                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               The examiner rejected the appellants’ claims 20 and 21.                
          They appeal therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We reverse.                


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The invention at issue in this appeal relates to visual                
          feedback for a user who is manipulating text on the screen of               
          a computer.  A graphical user interface for a computer                      







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007