Ex parte HARRELL et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2000-0185                                                        
          Application 08/847,111                                                      


          1993                                                                        
          Lusen et al. (Lusen)               5,289,658           Mar.  1,             
          1994                                                                        


          Claims 1 through 4 and 17 through 20 stand rejected under                   
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Iwasaki in view of               
          Lusen.                                                                      


          Claims 1, 5, 6, 8 through 16, 21, 22 and 24 through 34                      
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                  
          over Iwasaki in view of Weber.                                              
                                                                                     
               Reference is made to the answer (Paper No. 10) for the                 
          examiner's reasoning in support of the above-noted rejections,              
          and to appellants' brief (Paper No. 9) and reply brief (Paper               
          No. 11) for the arguments thereagainst.                                     


          OPINION                                                                     


          Having carefully reviewed and evaluated the obviousness                     
          issues raised in this appeal in light of the record before us,              

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007