The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TSUNEKAZU UDAGAWA
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0203
Application No. 08/924,099
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Tsunekazu Udagawa originally took this appeal from the
final rejection of claims 1, 2 and 7 through 9, all of the
claims pending in the application. Upon reconsideration, the
examiner has since allowed claim 9 (see page 2 in the
examiner’s answer, Paper No. 13). Thus, the appeal as to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007