Ex parte ZEHNDER - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2000-0204                                                        
          Application No. 08/512,068                                                  


          Bolinger                 3,721,419                Mar. 20, 1973             


          Claim 13 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                        
          anticipated by Bolinger.  More particularly, the examiner has               
          relied upon the embodiment of the wick holding element seen in              
          Figure 8 of Bolinger, urging that element (36) is a candle                  
          wick holding grate comprising a base member (plate 42 and                   
          flange portions 58) with a plurality of apertures (60) formed               
          in the base member and through each of which apertures a                    
          candle wick can be passed, and a plurality of grooves or                    
          notches (62) each of which can hold a candle wick after the                 
          wick has been passed through an aperture in the base member.                
          The examiner further indicates with regard to the "whereby"                 
          clause of claim 13 that element (36) of Bolinger is inherently              
          capable of being shipped with candles as a part of a shipping               
          container.                                                                  


          Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced                   
          by the examiner and appellant regarding the above-noted                     
          rejection, we refer to the examiner's answer (Paper No. 26,                 
          mailed July 19, 1999) and to appellant's brief (Paper No. 25,               
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007