Ex parte JODOIN et al. - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
                    today was not written for publication and is                      
                         not binding precedent of the Board                           
                                                       Paper No. 27                   

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    _______________                                   
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                              Ex parte RONALD E. JODOIN,                              
                                   ROBERT P. LOCE and                                 
                                    REINER ESCHBACH                                   
                                     ______________                                   
                                   Appeal No. 2000-0238                               
                              Application 08/342,283                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                              ON BRIEF                                                
                                    _______________                                   
          Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and GROSS, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                                                                     
                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                 

               Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s              
          final rejection of claims 15-18, 20 and 21.  The examiner has               
          allowed claim 5, and pages 1 and 2 of the Answer indicate that              
          the examiner has withdrawn an outstanding rejection under 35                
          U.S.C.                                                                      
          § 103 of claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9-14, 22 and 24.  Appellants’                
          amendment filed on June 4, 2001, canceled these latter claims in            
                                           1                                          




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007