The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID A. SAAR
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0327
Application No. 08/745,330
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before BARRETT, LALL, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-5 and 11-21 , which 1
are all of the claims pending in this application. Claims 6-
10 have been canceled.
BACKGROUND
1 The amendment (Paper No. 11, filed October 5, 1998) submitted
subsequent to the final rejection was denied entry by the examiner (Paper No.
12, mailed October 20, 1998). The amendment attempted to cancel claim 17,
which is not listed in appellant's brief as being on appeal. As claim 17 was
never canceled, we consider the claim to be before us for decision on appeal.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007