The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 42
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ROBERT DEMUTH,
JÜRG FAAS,
PETER FRITZSCHE,
and
EDUARD NÜSSLI
_____________
Appeal No. 2000-0331
Application No. 08/822,145
______________
HEARD: NOVEMBER 29, 2001
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and DIXON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 811
through 91.
The disclosed invention relates to a controlled cleaning
1In the parent application, the Board in a decision dated
January 23, 1997 affirmed the 35 U.S.C. § 112 lack of
enablement rejection of claims 54 through 80.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007