Ex parte MCNALLY - Page 6




              Appeal No. 2000-0608                                                                   Page 6                 
              Application No. 08/799,499                                                                                    


                     For the reasons expressed above, it is our conclusion that Ball fails to establish a                   
              prima facie case of obviousness with regard to the subject matter recited in independent                      
              claim 10.  This being the case, we will not sustain the rejection of claim 10 or, it follows, of              
              claims 11-15, which depend therefrom.                                                                         






































Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007