THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARTIN BRAHM, GERHARD RUTTMANN
AND LUTZ SCHMALSTIEG
___________
Appeal No. 2000-1147
Application No. 08/706,5511
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and SCHAFER and TIERNEY,
Administrative Patent Judges.
TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. §134 from the examiner’s refusal to allow
claims 10-20. We reverse the examiner’s rejection of record.
1Application for patent filed on September 6, 1996. This application claims benefit under 35
USC §119 of DE Application 19534162.7, filed September 15, 1995. The real party in interest is
Bayer AG.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007