Ex parte BOSCH et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  
                                                            Paper No. 15              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                     __________                                       
           Ex parte DANIEL J. BOSCH, HAL W. COUSINS, ED L. HENDRICKS,                 
          DONALD R. JOHNSON and THOMAS F. MITCHELL                                    
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2000-1298                                  
                               Application 08/938,779                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      

          Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and BAHR, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 10 through 13.  Claims 18 and 19, the only              
          other claims pending in the application, have been withdrawn                
          from further consideration as being directed to a non-elected               
          invention.  Claims 1 through 9 and 14 through 17 have been                  
          canceled.                                                                   

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007