Ex parte BERG et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2000-1669                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/433,328                                                  


                              (35 U.S.C. § 102(e) date, Feb. 16,                      
                         1993)                                                        
          Blower et al. (Blower)        WO 91/00117         Jan. 10, 1991             
                    (published international                                          
               application)                                                           
                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claims 16 and 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as               
          being unpatentable over Blower, in view of Kraemer and                      
          Calvert.                                                                    


               Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced              
          by the examiner and appellants regarding the above-noted                    
          rejections, we make reference to the rejection (Paper No. 14,               
          mailed June 4, 1998), the final rejection (Paper No. 18,                    
          mailed December 3, 1998) and answer (Paper No. 22, mailed May               
          13, 1999) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of               
          the rejection, and to the brief (Paper No. 21, filed April 12,              
          1999) and reply brief (Paper No. 24, filed June 24, 1999) for               
          the appellants' arguments thereagainst.                                     


                                       OPINION                                        









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007