The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 37
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARK H. MILLER, BRUCE E. WIGTON
and KENNETH LONNGREN
____________
Appeal No. 2000-1914
Application No. 08/718,643
____________
OH BRIEF 1
____________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 7, 11 through 16, 19, 21, 22, 26 through 32, 34
1After a review of the appeal, this panel of the Board,
in accordance with 37 CFR 1.194(c), determined that the oral
hearing set for January 25, 2001 was not necessary since the
examiner’s three rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) could not
be sustained. Counsel for appellants was so notified by
Programs and Resources Administrator Craig Feinberg on January
22, 2001.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007