Ex parte BOUDRY et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 2000-1978                                       Page 7           
          Application No. 08/898,905                                                  


          body in use to at least temporarily secure the bodyfacing                   
          surface of the diaper directly to the wearer's body.                        


               For the reasons set forth above all the limitations of                 
          claims 1 to 9, 11, 12 and 17 to 30 are not disclosed in                     
          Takemoto, consequently, the decision of the examiner to reject              
          claims 1 to 9, 11, 12 and 17 to 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as              
          being anticipated by Takemoto is reversed.                                  


          The anticipation rejection based upon Le Bolt                               
               We will not sustain the rejection of claims 19 and 31                  
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Le Bolt.                   


               Le Bolt discloses a disposable diaper.  As shown in                    
          Figures 1-3, the diaper includes two long strips of self-                   
          sealing adhesive 17 applied to the outer surface of the diaper              
          so they cannot contact the baby's skin and two small areas of               
          self-sealing adhesive 18 located on the inside surface of the               
          diaper.  As shown in Figure 3, the two long strips of self-                 
          sealing adhesive 17 and the two small areas of self-sealing                 
          adhesive 18 cooperate together to fasten the diaper on a baby.              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007