Ex parte WIKLUND - Page 2




                     Appeal No. 2000-2062                                                                                                                                              
                     Application No. 08/108,698                                                                                                                                        


                     brief.                                                                                                                                                            
                                The references applied in the final rejection are:1                                                                                                    
                     Hainke (German patent)                                497,432                                    May   8, 1930                                                    
                     Lahtinen (Finnish patent)    81,986                                                              Sep. 28, 1990                                                    
                                Claim 17 stands finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                                                                                              
                     as unpatentable over Lahtinen in view of Hainke.                                                                                                                  
                     Background                                                                                                                                                        
                                On February 19, 1998, a panel of this Board issued a                                                                                                   
                     decision (Paper No. 41) in which the rejections of claims 5 to                                                                                                    
                     7, 9 to 11, 15 and 16 were reversed, and, pursuant to 37 CFR                                                                                                      
                     § 1.196(b), new rejections of those claims under 35 U.S.C. §                                                                                                      
                     103 were entered, including a rejection of claims 5 to 7, 9 to                                                                                                    
                     11, 15 and 16 as unpatentable over Lahtinen in view of Hainke.                                                                                                    
                     In subsequent prosecution, appellant canceled claims 5 to 7, 9                                                                                                    
                     to 11, 15 and 16, and added claims 17 to 24.  After claims 17                                                                                                     
                     to 24 were finally rejected (Paper No. 43), claim 17 was                                                                                                          
                     amended and claims 18 to 24 were canceled.                                                                                                                        
                     The Rejection                                                                                                                                                     
                                The relevant disclosures of Lahtinen and Hainke have                                                                                                   


                                1 Translations of these references were forwarded to                                                                                                   
                     appellant on February 19, 1998.                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                          2                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007