The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte NORIYOSHI SATO and SHINICHI TERAO
_____________
Appeal No. 2000-2139
Application No. 08/938,704
______________
HEARD: April 26, 2001
_______________
Before CALVERT, COHEN and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
9, 11 and 12, all the claims remaining in the application.
The claims on appeal are drawn to an electromagnetic
isolation apparatus for an electronic device; the particular
device discussed in detail in the specification is a portable
(cordless) telephone. Claims 9, 11 and 12 are reproduced in
the appendix of appellants’ brief.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007