Ex parte BOTTING - Page 11




          Appeal No. 2000-2175                                       Page 11          
          Application No. 09/268,925                                                  


               In view of the determinations made above that the words                
          "HVAC plastic duct connector" as recited in claims 1 and 7 do               
          give "life and meaning" and provide further positive                        
          limitations to the invention claimed, we conclude that the hose             
          jacket of Meyer does not anticipate the subject matter of                   
          claims 1 and 7.  Accordingly, the decision of the examiner to               
          reject independent claims 1 and 7, and claims 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and             
          9 dependent thereon, based on Meyer is reversed.                            


          The rejection based on Botsolas                                             
               We will not sustain the rejection of claims 11-14 under                
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Botsolas.                     


               The record is clear that the examiner has given little or              
          no patentable weight to the "providing" step of claim 11 or the             
          "connecting" steps of claim 11 (see answer, p. 5).  This is                 
          clearly in error.  Under 35 U.S.C. § 103 all words in a claim               
          must be considered in judging the patentability of that claim               
          against the prior art.  In re Wilson, 424 F.2d 1382, 1385, 165              
          USPQ 494, 496 (CCPA 1970).  Furthermore, it is well established             
          that the materials on which a process is carried out must be                







Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007