Ex parte ZEHRUNG - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2001-0207                                                        
          Application No. 09/151,003                                                  

          said push bar linkage, said star wheel door latch for                       
          unlocking said door when disengaged from said first end;                    
               engaging a second end of said sliding catch directly to a              
          plunger of a solenoid; and                                                  
               operating said plunger in response to a change in                      
          electrical power for sliding said sliding catch to said free                
          position for disengaging said first end from said star wheel                
          door latch.                                                                 



                                    THE PRIOR ART                                     
               The references relied on by the examiner as evidence of                
          obviousness are:                                                            
          Miller                        4,801,163                Jan. 31,             
          1989                                                                        
          Smith et al. (Smith)          4,824,150                Apr. 25,             
          1989                                                                        
          Choi                               4,968,070                Nov.            
          6, 1990                                                                     
          Cross et al. (Cross)          4,976,476                Dec. 11,             
          1990                                                                        

                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 1, 3, 5 through 7, 9, 11 and 12 stand rejected                  
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Smith in                
          view of Cross.                                                              
               Claims 2 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as              
          being unpatentable over Smith in view of Cross and Choi.                    

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007