Ex Parte CARLSON et al - Page 6




          Appeal No. 2001-0258                                       Page 6           
          Application No. 08/821,978                                                  


          new ground of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b) to give               
          appellants an opportunity to respond thereto.                               
                             The obviousness rejections                               
               We shall not sustain the examiner's 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                 
          rejections of claims 10-46.  For the reasons expressed below in             
          our new ground of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b), these            
          claims are indefinite.  Therefore, the prior art rejections must            
          fall because they are necessarily based on speculative assumption           
          as to the meaning of the claims.  See In re Steele, 305 F.2d 859,           
          862-63, 134 USPQ 292, 295 (CCPA 1962).  It should be understood,            
          however, that our decision in this regard is based solely on the            
          indefiniteness of the claimed subject matter, and does not                  
          reflect on the adequacy of the prior art evidence applied in                
          support of the rejections.                                                  
                               NEW GROUND OF REJECTION                                
               Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b), we enter the following new              
          ground of rejection.                                                        















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007