The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ERIK NELSON and JEFFREY TEACHOUT
____________
Appeal No. 2001-0287
Application No. 09/107,056
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, McQUADE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 10-17 and 19, which are all of the claims
pending in this application. Claims 1-9 and 18 were canceled
subsequent to the final rejection (see Paper Nos. 8 and 9).
BACKGROUND
The appellants’ invention relates to a pivoting platform
in an electronic equipment cabinet. In particular, such a
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007