The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ANILKUMAR BHATT et al.
____________
Appeal No. 2001-0323
Application No. 09/159,360
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, FRANKFORT and
NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Upon consideration of appellants' brief (Paper No. 11,
filed April 21, 2000), the examiner's answer (Paper No. 12,
mailed July 13, 2000), and appellants' reply brief (Paper No.
13, filed September 1, 2000), the examiner's rejection of
claims 2 to 11 and 13 to 24, the only claims pending in this
reissue application, under 35 U.S.C. § 251 is REVERSED.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007