Ex Parte HASSHI et al - Page 7



          Appeal No. 2001-0436                                                        
          Application No. 09/040,361                                                  

                                       Summary                                        
               The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-3, 5 and 6             
          as being anticipated by Moriyama is reversed on procedural                  
          grounds.                                                                    
               A new ground of rejection of claims 1-3, 5 and 6 has been              
          made pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b).                                         
               The decision of the examiner is reversed.                              
               This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to           
          37 CFR § 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final rule             
          notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203 Off.              
          Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).  37 CFR              
          § 1.196(b) provides that “[a] new ground of rejection shall not             
          be considered final for purposes of judicial review.”                       
               37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellants, WITHIN            
          TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of              
          the following two options with respect to the new ground of                 
          rejection to avoid termination of proceedings (37 CFR § 1.197(c))           
          as to the rejected claims:                                                  
                    (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of                            
               the claims so rejected or a showing of facts                           
               relating to the claims so rejected, or both,                           
               and have the matter reconsidered by the                                
               examiner, in which event the application will                          
               be remanded to the examiner . . . .                                    

                                          7                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007