Ex parte BAUMSTEIGER - Page 9




          Appeal No. 2001-1181                                                        
          Serial No. 09/131,156                                                       


          one of the following two options with respect to the new                    
          ground of rejection to avoid termination of proceedings (37                 
          CFR § 1.197(c)) as to the rejected claims:                                  
                    (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the                        
               claims so rejected or a showing of facts relating to                   
               the claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter                   
               reconsidered by the examiner, in which event the                       
               application will be remanded to the examiner. . . .                    
                    (2) Request that the application be reheard                       
               under § 1.197(b) by the Board of Patent Appeals and                    
               Interferences upon the same record. . . .                              
               Should appellant elect to prosecute further before the                 
          Primary Examiner pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)(1), in order to              
          preserve the right to seek review under 35 U.S.C. §§ 141 or                 
          145 with respect to the affirmed rejection, the effective date              
          of the affirmance is deferred until conclusion of the                       
          prosecution before the examiner unless, as a mere incident to               
          the limited prosecution, the affirmed rejection is overcome.                
               If the appellant elects prosecution before the examiner                
          and this does not result in allowance of the application,                   
          abandonment                                                                 




          or a second appeal, this case should be returned to us for                  
                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007