Appeal No. 2001-1225 Page 9
Application No. 09/019,693
claim 7, do not overcome the deficiency in the rejection of claim 4. We thus also will not
sustain the rejection of claims 6 and 7, which depend from claim 4.
SUMMARY
The rejection of claims 1, 2, 3, 8 and 9 is sustained.
The rejection of claims 4, 5, 6 and 7 is not sustained.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007