Ex Parte LUGER - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2001-1280                                                        
          Application No. 07/977,163                                                  

               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Lawson              4,200,359                Apr. 29, 1980                  
          Weureither          2,331,633                Jun. 6, 19743                  
               (German patent)                                                        
               The following rejections are before us for review.                     
               Claim 17 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                 
          paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point            
          out and distinctly claim the subject matter which appellant                 
          regards as the invention.4                                                  
               Claims 11-14 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)            
          as being unpatentable over Lawson in view of Weureither.                    
               Reference is made to the brief5 (Paper No. 31, filed August            
          16, 1996) and reply brief (Paper No. 37, filed January 15, 1998)            
          and the final rejection (Paper No. 22, mailed October 19, 1995)             
          and examiner's answer (Paper No. 36, mailed November 18, 1997)              

               3 An English language translation of this reference, prepared by the   
          Patent and Trademark Office, is appended hereto.                            
               4 Although the examiner has not expressly repeated this rejection in the
          answer, it is apparent from the examiner's comment in the last paragraph on 
          page 2 of the answer that the § 112, second paragraph, rejection has been   
          maintained by the examiner.                                                 
               5  The August 16, 1996 appeal brief is merely a signed copy of the     
          earlier brief filed January 3, 1996 (Paper No. 25).  All references to the  
          brief in this decision are to the August 16, 1996 brief.                    
                                          3                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007