Appeal No. 2001-1328
Application 09/079,537
been used as a template to selectively combine isolated
disclosures in the prior art without any legitimate suggestion
or motivation to do so.
Accordingly, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) rejection of independent claims 1 and 7, and
dependent claims 3 through 5 as being unpatentable over
Laurash in view of Neubauer, or the standing 35 U.S.C. §
103(a) rejection of dependent claims 2 and 6 as being
unpatentable over Laurash in view of Neubauer and Doll.
SUMMARY
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 through 7
is reversed.
REVERSED
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007