Ex Parte DEMARCO et al - Page 12




          Appeal No. 2001-1898                                                        
          Application No. 08/835,945                                                  


          modification obvious unless the desirability thereof was                    
          suggested by the prior art.  In re Fritch, 972 F.2d 1260, 1266,             
          23 USPQ2d 1780, 1783-84 (Fed. Cir. 1992).                                   
          Rejection Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)                                     
               Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b), claims 57 and 59 to 62 are              
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Stenberg             
          in view of the Snap-on Catalog.  Stenberg is discussed above in             
          relation to rejection (4).  The Snap-on Catalog at page 233                 
          discloses, as item Q, a file handle which is cylindrical, with a            
          l" diameter.  It would have been obvious to one of ordinary                 
          skill, in view of the Snap-on Catalog, to use a cylindrical shape           
          for the file handle 2 of Stenberg, the Catalog suggesting that              
          such a handle is desirable because it "[p]rovides a large,                  
          comfortable grip for all bastard cut files."  With a cylindrical            
          handle, the ends of the bar 6 of Stenberg would be made                     
          cylindrical so that they would "join" (conform to) the surface of           
          the handle and not injure the user's hand, as disclosed at page             
          3, last two lines.                                                          
          Conclusion                                                                  
               The examiner's decision to reject claims 55 and 56 under               
          § 112, second paragraph, is affirmed; to reject claims 47 to 56             
          under § 102(b) is affirmed as to claims 47, 49, 52, 54 and 55,              

                                          12                                          





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007